The press today as a
medium of dissemination of information has bypassed it conventional uses. The
press today not only informs creation and dissemination of public opinion but
also entertains. It is originally seen as a guardian of public interest,
witness to hold the state accountable to the public.
It is to be a bridge
between the people and government to create an alternate feedback system which
is free from the influence of the bureaucracy and the politicians. It is to
make the state aware of the demands on the nature of policies the public wants
from them. A fair honest objective press is the most important constituent of
what the west today calls good governance, so much so that the French statesman Talleyrand said “without freedom of press, there can be
no representative government”.
For freedom of the press to be possible in
reality, it cannot be subservient to the interests of the politicians,
bureaucrats and industrialists. It has to be a neutral unifying force
inculcating the ethos of the times with the ethos of our freedom struggle.
Historically the press paid a big part in
the Indian national Freedom struggle, in which we had great leaders like
Tilak,Maulana Azad and Mahatma Gandhi as editors of newspapers. Mahatma Gandhi
himself edited the Indian Opinion, Young India, Navajivan and the Harijan and
can be said as the most influential journalist of his times. The press in India
acted as cornerstone of democracy ,a place where grievances will be heard by
the rich and powerful of this country. But as more power came to the press so I
might dare “the wolves have arrived too and in number”.
Today we have more than ninety thousand
publications running in this country (the exact number is 93,985 registered
publications, 850 permitted TV channels under news and current affairs category
and 437 under non-news category). The Doordarshan which some of us feel has
lost viewership itself runs 37 Channels. Besides, there are over 250 FM radios
stations and numerous internet websites. Such numbers gives us a reason to be
proud of the diverse Indian media industry but today media’s integrity is being
questioned, the very basis of its existence to provide a medium between the
public and the state has seen to become corrupted by vested interests.
Today media is plagued by problems of paid
news
which hit epic levels in election years(considering next year is an election
year , it will be good exercise to watch for fabricated news this year).
On January 15 this year, the Election
Commision found that Madhya Pradesh Cabinet Minister Narottam Mishra “failed to
lodge his accounts of his election expenses in the manner prescribed by law.”
He faces possible disqualification. The EC’s notice to Dr. Mishra concerns 42
news items about him during the November 2008 state elections in Madhya
Pradesh. These, it believed “read more like election advertisement(s) in favour
of you alone rather than (as) news reports.” The EC names four newspapers in
its notice: Dainik Bhaskar,Nai Duniya, Aacharan and Dainik
Datia Prakash. Dainik Bhaskar is the second most-read daily
in the country.What should be done to such newspapers and such reporters. The
author believes that EC should ban such newspapers if found guilty of paid
news.
We have three documents that highlight the issues mentioned in the
table above. The first is a 2009 report by the Administrative Staff College of
India (ASCI) at the instance of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting on ‘Cross
Media Ownership in India’. The second, February 2013 Consultation Paper by the
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on media ownership question. The
third is a report on ‘Paid News’ made on May 6, 2013 by the Parliament’s
Standing Committee on Information Technology. They together tell a truth that
many would not like to hear.
The 300 odd news
channel cannot get enough advertising revenue then when the question of
survival versus ethics, how many do you think that in today’s time ethics would
come on top. The coming of big business into
media and the resultant concentration and market domination are best
summarized by the TRAI chairman’s Rahul Khullar comment during the discussion
with a senior executive of Bennett Coleman and Co. Limited ( refer http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/media-crossholding-in-cross-hairs/article4743586.ece)
pointing to another participant, who had moments earlier said “3 or 4 media
houses” control everything, Mr. Khullar shot back, “There is a large body of
Indian citizens who feel that way. Wake up and smell the coffee.”And we do need
to wake up and smell the coffee due to the growing political control of media
today, from Shrimoni Akali Dal’s to DMK nearly every political party is
involved in one way or the other to control information given to the public. The
question that whether media censorship happens is one which is yet to be proven
but so has been charges against most politicians in Indian courts.
The Article above has
the TRAI listing out examples. Sun TV and Essel Group have interests in print,
TV, FM as well as distribution platforms like Direct-To-Home (DTH) and MSOs.
The Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group is present in all media segments as well as
DTH, while Star India has interests in broadcasting and radio, as well as
distribution platforms. Ushodaya (Eenadu), India Today, Times Group, ABP Group,
Bhaskar Group, Jagran Prakashan, Malayala Manorama Group have interests in all
three media segments — print, TV and FM radio.
Corporate India can
easily influence policies and gain mileage in the name of broadcasting news.
Recent case of Zee News Executives asking for 200 crores from Jindal Steel is
just one example. The case of declining values in Indian Society is endemic and
this is affecting all parts of it. The magnitude of this has been highlighted
by the TRAI paper , It drew a direct link
between “uncontrolled ownership” and “paid news, corporate and political lobbying
by television channels, propagation of biased analysis and forecast both in
political arena as well as corporate sector and irresponsible reporting to
create sensationalism.” It points to the “even more lethal issue where the
ownership/control rests with entities which have both business and political
interests.” The paper concluded that regulating media ownership is “essential
in the public interest as a guarantee of plurality and diversity of opinion.”This
is direct threat to the democracy of India. It has or will lead to an elite
capturing of the information system which values GDP growth rate and repo rates
over nutrition, IMR, education etc. The debates on television these days over
the Food security bill are more about the cost of bill rather than
understanding the benefits of such a scheme highlights the capitalistic nature
of our media.
The need for media
regulation was highlighted by News of the World Scandal that hit the Rupert
Murdoch group and let to closing of an iconic paper (the author wishes
sincerely that the same tragedy fall upon some of the newspapers in India doing
paid news and irresponsible reporting which has led to extreme harassment to
the people of this country).
In conclusion I would
like to quote words of Walter Lippmann, perhaps the most renowned and respected
American journalist of the 20th century. “There is no higher law in
journalism,” he wrote, “than to tell the truth and to shame the devil - and
remain detached from the great.”
The Ideal of detachment
of the press from the politics and unethical corporate lobbying is a worthy
ideal expressed and should be strived towards replication by the Indian Media
Industry.